mirror of https://github.com/docusealco/docuseal
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
178 lines
6.0 KiB
178 lines
6.0 KiB
# Quality Gate: Story 1.1 - Institution Admin Management
|
|
# Generated by Quinn (Test Architect) on 2025-01-03
|
|
|
|
gate_id: "1.1.institution-admin"
|
|
story_title: "Institution Admin Management"
|
|
review_date: "2025-01-03"
|
|
reviewer: "Quinn (Test Architect)"
|
|
|
|
# Gate Decision
|
|
decision: "CONDITIONAL_PASS"
|
|
decision_date: "2025-01-03"
|
|
requires_security_review: false # Winston's review complete
|
|
architect_reviewed: true
|
|
architect: "Winston"
|
|
|
|
# Risk Summary
|
|
risk_summary:
|
|
totals:
|
|
critical: 2 # score 9
|
|
high: 4 # score 6
|
|
medium: 1 # score 4
|
|
low: 1 # score 2-3
|
|
highest:
|
|
- id: "SEC-001"
|
|
score: 9
|
|
title: "Cross-Institution Data Access Vulnerability"
|
|
category: "security"
|
|
- id: "SEC-002"
|
|
score: 9
|
|
title: "Invitation Token Security Flaws"
|
|
category: "security"
|
|
recommendations:
|
|
must_fix:
|
|
- "Implement database-level data isolation (SEC-001)"
|
|
- "Security audit of token system (SEC-002)"
|
|
- "Migration rollback testing on production-like data"
|
|
monitor:
|
|
- "Performance benchmarking (PERF-001)"
|
|
- "Security event logging (OPS-001)"
|
|
- "Integration compatibility (TECH-001)"
|
|
|
|
# Quality Attributes Assessment
|
|
quality_attributes:
|
|
security:
|
|
status: "CONCERNS"
|
|
notes: "2 critical risks require immediate attention. Data isolation and token security must be perfect before production."
|
|
required_actions:
|
|
- "Security architecture review with Winston"
|
|
- "Database-level isolation implementation"
|
|
- "Token system security audit"
|
|
|
|
performance:
|
|
status: "PASS_WITH_MONITORING"
|
|
notes: "Risk identified but mitigatable with proper indexing and benchmarking"
|
|
requirements:
|
|
- "Index all foreign keys and role queries"
|
|
- "Benchmark existing operations (<10% degradation)"
|
|
- "Load testing with 1000+ concurrent users"
|
|
|
|
reliability:
|
|
status: "PASS_WITH_MONITORING"
|
|
notes: "Migration rollback plan exists but needs testing"
|
|
requirements:
|
|
- "Test rollback on production-like data"
|
|
- "Zero-downtime migration pattern"
|
|
- "Feature flag for emergency rollback"
|
|
|
|
maintainability:
|
|
status: "PASS"
|
|
notes: "Follows existing patterns, additive changes only"
|
|
|
|
compliance:
|
|
status: "PASS_WITH_MONITORING"
|
|
notes: "Multi-tenancy requirements must be verified"
|
|
|
|
# Test Coverage Requirements
|
|
test_coverage:
|
|
minimum_new_code: 80
|
|
required_test_types:
|
|
- "Model specs (validations, associations, scopes)"
|
|
- "Request specs (authentication, authorization, data isolation)"
|
|
- "System specs (end-to-end workflows)"
|
|
- "Security tests (cross-institution access)"
|
|
- "Performance tests (benchmark existing operations)"
|
|
|
|
critical_scenarios:
|
|
- "Cross-institution data access prevention"
|
|
- "Token reuse and expiration validation"
|
|
- "Migration rollback success"
|
|
- "Existing DocuSeal compatibility (IV1-IV3)"
|
|
|
|
# Integration Verification Requirements
|
|
integration_verification:
|
|
IV1_authentication:
|
|
description: "Existing DocuSeal authentication still works"
|
|
status: "REQUIRED"
|
|
tests: ["Run existing user login tests", "Verify JWT tokens work for legacy endpoints"]
|
|
|
|
IV2_roles:
|
|
description: "Role system compatibility"
|
|
status: "REQUIRED"
|
|
tests: ["Test existing DocuSeal roles unaffected", "Verify new roles are additive only"]
|
|
|
|
IV3_performance:
|
|
description: "Performance impact <10%"
|
|
status: "REQUIRED"
|
|
tests: ["Benchmark existing user operations", "Load test with production-like data"]
|
|
|
|
# Security Requirements
|
|
security_requirements:
|
|
data_isolation:
|
|
description: "No cross-institution access"
|
|
enforcement: ["Database scopes", "API authorization", "UI validation"]
|
|
testing: "All access paths tested with malicious inputs"
|
|
|
|
token_security:
|
|
description: "Invitation tokens secure and single-use"
|
|
requirements: ["SHA-256 hashing", "Redis single-use tracking", "24h expiration"]
|
|
testing: "Reuse, expiration, race condition tests"
|
|
|
|
audit_logging:
|
|
description: "Security events logged"
|
|
requirements: ["Unauthorized access attempts", "Token validation failures"]
|
|
monitoring: "Alert on >5 attempts/hour"
|
|
|
|
# Deployment Strategy
|
|
deployment:
|
|
approach: "Phased rollout with feature flag"
|
|
feature_flag: "Docuseal.enable_cohort_management"
|
|
rollback_plan: "Tested database rollback + code revert"
|
|
monitoring: "Security events, performance metrics, error rates"
|
|
|
|
# Prerequisites for Production
|
|
prerequisites:
|
|
- "✅ Security architecture review completed"
|
|
- "✅ Database isolation implemented and tested"
|
|
- "✅ Token security audit passed"
|
|
- "✅ Migration rollback verified on production-like data"
|
|
- "✅ Performance benchmarks within 10% threshold"
|
|
- "✅ Existing test suite passes (IV1-IV3)"
|
|
- "✅ Security event monitoring deployed"
|
|
- "✅ Feature flag ready for emergency rollback"
|
|
|
|
# Sign-offs Required
|
|
sign_offs:
|
|
- "Security Team Lead"
|
|
- "Database Administrator"
|
|
- "Performance Engineer"
|
|
- "Product Owner"
|
|
|
|
# References
|
|
references:
|
|
- "Risk Assessment: docs/qa/assessments/1.1.institution-admin-risk-20250103.md"
|
|
- "Story: docs/stories/1.1.institution-admin.md"
|
|
- "Architecture: docs/architecture.md"
|
|
|
|
# Notes
|
|
notes: |
|
|
WINSTON'S ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMPLETE - Story approved for development with 4-layer security architecture.
|
|
|
|
**MANDATORY IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE:**
|
|
1. Foundation (Database + Model isolation)
|
|
2. Security Core (Token system + Event logging)
|
|
3. Controllers (Authorization + Services)
|
|
4. Testing (IV4 security tests + Penetration testing)
|
|
5. Features (UI + Integration)
|
|
|
|
**⚠️ NO FEATURE WORK until Phase 4 security tests pass**
|
|
|
|
**Critical Requirements:**
|
|
- 4-layer data isolation (Database → Model → Controller → UI)
|
|
- Cryptographic token security (SHA-256 + Redis + atomic operations)
|
|
- Comprehensive security event logging
|
|
- IV4 security tests must pass before production
|
|
- Security audit required before deployment
|
|
|
|
The 10% performance degradation threshold is strict - benchmark existing operations
|
|
before making changes. All IV1-IV5 integration tests are mandatory. |